📊Executive Summary

The Delhi High Court's ruling in the case of Seagate Technology LLC v. Daichi International addresses the refurbishment and sale of end-of-life hard disk drives (HDDs). The court's decision clarifies the legal framework for refurbishing goods without infringing on trademark rights, particularly when original brand names are removed. This ruling is significant for procurement teams as it impacts the secondary market for HDDs, which are often repurposed for various applications despite being categorized as end-of-life products. The refurbishment process allows for extended warranties and alternative uses, highlighting a potential sourcing opportunity for companies looking to utilize refurbished components. However, the legal implications surrounding trademark infringement and warranty issues must be closely monitored by procurement teams....